Issues
- 0
Please add version tags to the repo
#182 opened by Peeja - 0
thank
#180 opened by MITCHELLNEAL1 - 1
Limiting delegation depth
#160 opened by AljoschaMeyer - 0
- 38
Way to connect delegation chains
#130 opened by Gozala - 3
- 2
Expiry field is required but may be set to null
#169 opened by andrewzhurov - 0
- 0
Reorganize the UCAN spec in different repos
#166 opened by bdehaynin - 1
Update raw data multicodec link
#164 opened by bgins - 5
Webauthn signature support
#159 opened by chunningham - 2
Clarify timestamp percision in the spec
#136 opened by Gozala - 4
Can there be some examples in `3.2.5 Attenuation`?
#135 opened by gobengo - 4
Under-specified format for revocation structure
#112 opened by cdata - 3
- 30
Syntax for an unattenuated delegation
#131 opened by Gozala - 21
Multiple "can" for a "with"
#123 opened by oed - 2
Clarify semantics of `OWN`
#141 opened by bumblefudge - 4
What if you can't derefence a CID?
#142 opened by bumblefudge - 2
- 4
- 8
- 1
Should we make proofs into IPLD native links
#137 opened by Gozala - 1
Clarify when multiple in prf field can occur
#147 opened by burdiyan - 0
Jan 2023 Community Call
#148 opened by heybeckyv - 4
JWT-specific minutae: the dreaded `kid` question
#144 opened by bumblefudge - 4
Should we support non DID principals ?
#139 opened by Gozala - 1
Create ucan-rpc spec repo
#64 opened by expede - 9
What does delegation with empty attenuations imply ?
#129 opened by Gozala - 1
Create ucan-graphql spec repo
#63 opened by expede - 5
Support for CWT
#30 opened by johnandersen777 - 1
Describe temporal & causal restrictions
#38 opened by expede - 0
fix: broken rights amplification URL
#115 opened by nicobao - 0
Ambiguous phrasing for handling DIDs with multiple keys
#110 opened by cdata - 1
spec incompatible test fixture
#68 opened by Gozala - 1
Create ucan-ipld spec repo
#62 opened by expede - 5
Disambiguate between UCAN capabilities that are introduced through delegation vs. introduced "via parenthood"
#21 opened by matheus23 - 1
"Nonstandard" Signature Types
#73 opened by expede - 1
Should `att` be required ?
#105 opened by Gozala - 1
- 2
Principal IDs and signature verification
#77 opened by chunningham - 2
Have existing contributors sign the CLA
#48 opened by expede - 7
Sign-In with Ethereum Support
#11 opened by expede - 3
Clarify activities and actors in Section 5.2
#32 opened by csuwildcat - 0
Image uses "potency" instead of "ability"
#15 opened by expede - 5
- 3
Proposal: Always use CIDs in prfs
#17 opened by Gozala - 1
Transport / format agnostic UCANs
#16 opened by Gozala - 0
Clarification on some possible ambiguity
#13 opened by QuinnWilton - 1