Possible bug - ActionLifecycle is not a subclass of ActionPattern
Closed this issue · 4 comments
ajnelson-nist commented
Bug description
Quoting @sbarnum in this comment:
action:ActionLifecycle is currently a subClass of action:Action which is appropriate but it should also be a subClass of action:ActionPattern.
Steps to reproduce
Lines 292--294 of 1.2.0's action.ttl
seem to confirm the bug description:
rdfs:subClassOf action:Action ;
rdfs:label "ActionLifecycle"@en ;
rdfs:comment "An action lifecycle is an action pattern consisting of an ordered set of multiple actions or subordinate action lifecycles."@en ;
Coordination
- Tracking in Jira ticket OC-304
- Administrative review completed, proposal announced to Ontology Committees (OCs) on 2024-01-18
- Solutions Approval to be discussed in OC meeting, 2024-01-18
- Solutions development phase completed.
- Backwards-incompatible implementation merged into
develop-2.0.0
- Milestone linked
- Documentation logged in pending release page
- Prerelease publication: CASE
develop-2.0.0
branch updated to track UCO's updateddevelop-2.0.0
branch
ajnelson-nist commented
I think as a structural change, this would be backwards-incompatible and would need to target UCO 2.0.0.
ajnelson-nist commented
From discussion on today's call, we believe the subclassing should be added/restored.
ajnelson-nist commented
I intend to process this as a bugfix proposal, not requiring a Solutions Approval vote. If there are any objections, please post them here before Monday, 2024-01-22.
ajnelson-nist commented
Clarification: This will be a bugfix Pull Request against the develop-2.0.0
branch.