Code Coverage : Unit Test and Coverage Schema different

[DrErique]

Hello and greetings from Hannover, Germany.
I have a question that affects the circumstance that our unit tests exists in a different schema than the tested code. The utPLSQL Framework invented the "a_coverage_schemes" - Parameter for that case.
For example
exec ut.run('UNITTEST', ut_coverage_html_reporter(), a_coverage_schemes=>ut_varchar2_list('ISUSER'));
Is there a way to do the same call with utplsql-cli ?

[pesse]

Hey @DrErique ,
thanks for your patience and for pointing this out.
You are right - for some reason there is no cli parameter to pass a_coverage_schemes to the test-runner, although Java-API would allow it.
I'll add this, shouldn't be a big problem.

[DrErique]

Hello Samuel, This would be a real help for us, because otherwise there is no implementation in Bamboo possible and I have to create the reports per hand. What shouldn't be the sense of it all. Please let me know if you got a beta version for us to try this out. Kind regards, Derik Wehrmann

…

_________________________________________________________________ Tel: -551 | Testmanager | IT SCM Von: Samuel Nitsche <notifications@github.com> Gesendet: Dienstag, 10. März 2020 22:40 An: utPLSQL/utPLSQL-cli <utPLSQL-cli@noreply.github.com> Cc: Wehrmann, Derik <D.Wehrmann@wertgarantie.com>; Mention <mention@noreply.github.com> Betreff: Re: [utPLSQL/utPLSQL-cli] Code Coverage : Unit Test and Coverage Schema different (#174) Hey @DrErique<https://github.com/DrErique> , thanks for your patience and for pointing this out. You are right - for some reason there is no cli parameter to pass a_coverage_schemes to the test-runner, although Java-API would allow it. I'll add this, shouldn't be a big problem. — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#174?email_source=notifications&email_token=AIPTY43JGD7BIKQYARB3HVDRG2XRDA5CNFSM4KSMRFBKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOEONIX6A#issuecomment-597330936>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AIPTY46RFHA755V4ZL6JD3LRG2XRDANCNFSM4KSMRFBA>.

[pesse]

@DrErique can you try out this one?
https://bintray.com/utplsql/utPLSQL-cli/download_file?file_path=utPLSQL-cli-develop-202003131529.zip

Parameter is --coverage-schemes

[DrErique]

Hello Samuel, Seems to work pretty stable. I saw even the documentation is already added. So thanks for replying an keep healthy ! With kind regards Derik Wehrmann Von: Samuel Nitsche <notifications@github.com> Gesendet: Freitag, 13. März 2020 16:32 An: utPLSQL/utPLSQL-cli <utPLSQL-cli@noreply.github.com> Cc: Wehrmann, Derik <D.Wehrmann@wertgarantie.com>; Mention <mention@noreply.github.com> Betreff: Re: [utPLSQL/utPLSQL-cli] Code Coverage : Unit Test and Coverage Schema different (#174) @DrErique<https://github.com/DrErique> can you try out this one? https://bintray.com/utplsql/utPLSQL-cli/download_file?file_path=utPLSQL-cli-develop-202003131529.zip Parameter is --coverage-schemes — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#174 (comment)>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AIPTY4YHHVNHCVDAAYEHSRDRHJGV5ANCNFSM4KSMRFBA>.