code-summarization

The aim of the project is to build a tool that can automatically produce a natural language summary of source code written in Python

Directories & descriptions

Directory	Description
V2	V2/parallel is the initial extracted function declaration, description & body. V2/repo_split contains the splits used in the original paper
data	Contains the processed dataset of function declaration+body, description, and generated ASTs for Python & Java
notebooks for java data	Contains the notebook artifacts used to run the process the data, train, and translate. The notebooks act as logs of training, showing the moving train acc, periodic validation acc, and runtimes involved for each experiment.
models for python data	The models generated for python dataset
predictions for java	Contains the predictions output from various tests conducted to evaluate the importance of different prep-processing steps for Java dataset
evals	Contains evaluation scores
utils	Helper methods for preprocessing tasks
parallel-corpus	The raw corpus used in the original paper

Data preprocessing description

The Python3 source codes, obtained from GitHub repositories, were preprocessed by removing the comments, removing semantically irrelevant spaces or new lines. An example of an extracted function is as follows:

Python function

def _interceptdot (w, X, y):

  ””” 
  Computes  y∗np . dot (X, w).
  It takes into consideration whether  the  intercept  should  be  fit.
  Parameters
  −−−−−−−−−−
  w : ndarray ,  ndarray ,  shape  ( n_features , )  or  ( n_features +  1 , )
    Coefficient  vector .
  [ . . . ]

  ”””

  c =  0
  if w.size  == X. shape [ 1 ]  +  1:
    c = w[−1]
    w = w[:−1]
    z =  safe_sparse_dot (X, w)  + c
    yz = y∗z
  return w,  c ,  yz

Extracted declaration

def _interceptdot(w, X, y):

Extracted docstring

’ Computes y∗np . dot (X, w) . DCNL It takes into consideration if the intercept should be fit or not. DCNL P arameters DCNL w : ndarray , shape ( n_features , ) or (n_features + 1 , ) DCNL Coefficient vector . DCNL [ . . . ] ’

Extracted function-body

DCSP c = 0.0 DCNL DCSP if (w.size == (X.shape [1] + 1) ): DCNL DCSP DCSP c = w[(−1)] DCNL DCSP DCSP w = w[:(−1)] DCNL DCSP z =(safe_sparse_dot(X, w) + c) DCNL DCSP yz = (y∗z) DCNL DCSP return w, c , yz

Extracted AST

"Module(body=[FunctionDef(name='_interceptdot', args=arguments(args=[arg(arg='w', annotation=None), arg(arg='X', annotation=None), arg(arg='y', annotation=None)], vararg=None, kwonlyargs=[], kw_defaults=[], kwarg=None, defaults=[]), body=[Expr(value=Str(s='\\n Computes y∗np . dot (X, w).\\n It takes into consideration whether the intercept should be fit.\\n Parameters\\n −−−−−−−−−−\\n w : ndarray , ndarray , shape ( n_features , ) or ( n_features + 1 , )\\n Coefficient vector .\\n [ . . . ]\\n\\n ')), Assign(targets=[Name(id='c', ctx=Store())], value=Num(n=0)), If(test=Compare(left=Attribute(value=Name(id='w', ctx=Load()), attr='size', ctx=Load()), ops=[Eq()], comparators=[BinOp(left=Subscript(value=Attribute(value=Name(id='X', ctx=Load()), attr='shape', ctx=Load()), slice=Index(value=Num(n=1)), ctx=Load()), op=Add(), right=Num(n=1))]), body=[Assign(targets=[Name(id='c', ctx=Store())], value=Subscript(value=Name(id='w', ctx=Load()), slice=Index(value=UnaryOp(op=USub(), operand=Num(n=1))), ctx=Load())), Assign(targets=[Name(id='w', ctx=Store())], value=Subscript(value=Name(id='w', ctx=Load()), slice=Slice(lower=None, upper=UnaryOp(op=USub(), operand=Num(n=1)), step=None), ctx=Load())), Assign(targets=[Name(id='z', ctx=Store())], value=BinOp(left=Call(func=Name(id='safe_sparse_dot', ctx=Load()), args=[Name(id='X', ctx=Load()), Name(id='w', ctx=Load())], keywords=[]), op=Add(), right=Name(id='c', ctx=Load()))), Assign(targets=[Name(id='yz', ctx=Store())], value=BinOp(left=Name(id='y', ctx=Load()), op=Mult(), right=Name(id='z', ctx=Load()))), Return(value=Tuple(elts=[Name(id='w', ctx=Load()), Name(id='c', ctx=Load()), Name(id='yz', ctx=Load())], ctx=Load()))], orelse=[])], decorator_list=[], returns=None)])"

Data

Java

Details on the dataset can be found at http://leclair.tech/data/funcom/#procdata

We use the filtered / tokenized datasets for the purpose of this project.

Due to size restrictions of Github, the all files can be downloaded from the following links:

Variations

Raw Java (link)
Tokenized Java (link)
Raw -> AST Java (link)
Raw -> AST Java Cleaned (link)

Each link contains a compressed file with the following folders:

train
1. functions
2. comments
valid
1. functions
2. comments
test
1. functions
2. comments

NOTE: The AST files were generated after reading in the source code from the JSON files, using the javalang module in Python

NOTE: Cleaned entails the removal of parentheses, brackets, and other special characters. For example:

NOTE: preprocessed here means:

The methods are split between method name and method body AND both have been tokenized and subtokenized
The method name has been stripped of parameters
The methody body has been converted to an AST with several paths sampled between terminal nodes

Python

The following are the inputs and targets when AST encodings are used :

Inputs (X)

unprocessed_ast_list_train.zip
unprocessed_ast_list_dev.zip
unprocessed_ast_list_test.zip

Outputs (Y)

unprocessed_summary_train.zip
unprocessed_summary_dev.zip
unprocessed_summary_test.zip

The following are the inputs and targets when AST encodings are not used. Instead, function bodies are used to train the model :

Inputs (X)

input_train.txt
input_dev.txt
input_test.txt

Outputs (Y)

summary_train.txt
summary_dev.txt
summary_test.txt

Source: code2seq

Model

We have used the Transformer model as the main architecture for our work. The standard encoder-decoder architecture has served to perform well for many machine translation tasks, hence the transformer architecture was built on top of it. The success of transformers in most NLP tasks has proven the fact that a simple architecture composed of attention mechanisms alone, can outperform the complex CNN and RNN architectures.

Our contribution

Evaluate the influence of Abstract Syntax Trees in the input to our summarization model
Assess the effect of static vs. dynamic typing by training the model on both Java and Python datasets
Gauge the importance of pre-processing the dataset before feeding it to the model vs. not performing any pre-processing

Evaluation Metrics:

BLEU score
ROUGE-1
ROUGE-2
ROUGE-3

References

[1] Barone, Antonio Valerio Miceli, and Rico Sennrich. "A parallel corpus of Python functions and documentation strings for automated code documentation and code generation." arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.02275 (2017).

[2] Alon, Uri, Omer Levy, and Eran Yahav. "code2seq: Generating sequences from structured representations of code." arXiv preprint arXiv:1808.01400 (2018).

vishwakaria/code-summarization

code-summarization

Directories & descriptions

Data preprocessing description

Python function

Extracted declaration

Extracted docstring

Extracted function-body

Extracted AST

Data

Java

Variations

Python

Inputs (X)

Outputs (Y)

Inputs (X)

Outputs (Y)

Model

Our contribution

Evaluation Metrics:

References