w3c-ccg/did-resolution
RELEASED DRAFT: Decentralized Identifier Resolution (DID Resolution) 0.2 Specification
HTMLNOASSERTION
Issues
- 0
Restricted access/Authentication/Authorization
#38 opened by jandrieu - 3
Streaming resolution
#57 opened by clehner - 1
Disallow JSON-LD remote context retrieval
#53 opened by peacekeeper - 3
Create DID resolution test suite
#64 opened by peacekeeper - 2
Parameter and metadata naming conventions
#62 opened by clehner - 5
- 3
If a DID method supports dereferencing, is it the responsibility of a DID Resolver to perform/calculate...
#30 opened by mwherman2000 - 4
Is "DID Resolver" the correct name for the piece of software that performs DID resolution?
#29 opened by mwherman2000 - 1
- 1
About resolving protocol question
#60 opened by zhanb - 3
Service Endpoint Construction inconsistency
#61 opened by clehner - 7
The did is not a url for the did, but for a resolution structure which as yet has no name
#23 opened by TomCJones - 1
Proposal: Define DDO as "DID Descriptor Object" that can bootstrap into EDO "Entity Descriptor Object"
#45 opened by brentzundel - 2
DID Resolution Result for DID URL Dereferencing
#69 opened by clehner - 3
- 1
- 5
Add support for JWKS
#46 opened by awoie - 1
- 3
Expand referenced keys to inline keys
#39 opened by peacekeeper - 1
Select top-level properties from Resolver
#59 opened by BernhardFuchs - 4
Resolver descriptions
#51 opened by philarcher - 8
- 0
- 2
Validate signatures/proofs of DID Document
#13 opened by peacekeeper - 3
What's the expected behavior for a DID Document that contains the same id property for publicKeys?
#65 opened by kdenhartog - 2
DID resolution context URL does not exist
#54 opened by troyronda - 4
Change key terms to lowercase
#48 opened by peacekeeper - 10
Portable DID resolution
#36 opened by kdenhartog - 3
Handling DID resolution after a fork
#43 opened by kdenhartog - 8
DID Resolver Logic Discards DIDs with Query Strings that are not Service Endpoints
#42 opened by SmithSamuelM - 8
[Abstract] DID Subject: There's issues with DID Subject not being well defined
#16 opened by mwherman2000 - 8
'remote' vs 'local' DID Resolvers
#28 opened by ChristopherA - 7
- 0
- 2
DID-URL uniqueness across time
#37 opened by kdenhartog - 0
Support "proxy" service type?
#35 opened by peacekeeper - 11
[High-Level Use Case Documents] List of high-level use case documents that guide/drive the `did-url` use cases for the `did-url` grammar
#34 opened by mwherman2000 - 19
`did-url` Use Cases: `did-url` Syntax Examples (and corresponding HTTP Binding Examples)
#32 opened by mwherman2000 - 13
DID Resolver did-url Use Cases: Draft DID did-url ABNF grammar fails for most of the basic use case patterns...
#33 opened by mwherman2000 - 3
[DID Reference] REQUIREMENT: A capability is needed to Test If a DID Exists on the Ledger
#24 opened by mwherman2000 - 13
[DID Reference] REQUIREMENT: Ability to query the list of DID Methods found on a particular DID Resolver or Ledger
#26 opened by mwherman2000 - 4
[DID Reference] REQUIREMENT: Ability to `ping` a DID Resolver to see if it is alive and responsive
#27 opened by mwherman2000 - 2
[DID Reference] REQUIREMENT: Ability to query a DID Method's resolution capabilities
#25 opened by mwherman2000 - 6
[Introduction] Clarify the role of the DID Resolution spec relative to other DID specs
#18 opened by mwherman2000 - 11
Signing validation is not defined.
#22 opened by TomCJones - 2
How will I be able to enumerate/search/retrieve-in-batches all of the DID Documents represented on a given Ledger?
#20 opened by mwherman2000 - 2
- 2
Should the definition of a DID Reference be moved to the DID Resolution spec?
#21 opened by mwherman2000 - 0
[Introduction] Clarify who is the Primary Target Audience for the DID Resolution spec
#19 opened by mwherman2000 - 4
Design versioning features
#12 opened by peacekeeper