w3c/rdf-star-wg-charter

Issues

• write a full proposal of all document names [1]

  #56 opened 2 years ago
  1

• set up the doodle for the recurring time

  #54 opened 5 months ago
  1

• reflect on what they think is missing in the CG report

  #53 opened 5 months ago
  1

• create a firsr "spec" repo

  #52 opened 5 months ago
  1

• Update timeline

  #48 opened 2 years ago
  0

• move all RDF specs to 18 month, and all SPARQL specs to 24 months

  #47 opened 2 years ago
  0

• contact Adrian and add him as chair in the charter draft

  #46 opened 2 years ago
  2

• Gregg Kellogg supports the creation of the RDF-star working group

  #44 opened 5 months ago
  0

• organize a call with Adrian Gschwend

  #43 opened 2 years ago
  3

• come back to Vladimir

  #42 opened 2 years ago
  2

• Thematix Partners LLC supports the creation of the RDF-star working group

  #41 opened 5 months ago
  0

• The Apache Software Foundation supports the creation of the RDF-star working group

  #40 opened 5 months ago
  0

• KRDB Research Centre for Knowledge and Data supports the creation of the RDF-star working group

  #39 opened 5 months ago
  0

• Insee supports the creation of the RDF-star working group

  #38 opened 5 months ago
  0

• Quentin Reul supports the creation of the RDF-star working group

  #37 opened 5 months ago
  0

• SEB group supports the creation of the RDF-star working group

  #36 opened 5 months ago
  0

• Fano Ramparany from the Orange group supports the creation of the RDF-star working group

  #35 opened 5 months ago
  2

• "Expression of Support" should not be the only way to respond to a proposal for new W3C work

  #34 opened 2 years ago
  2

• Add Ora Lassila as one of the expected chair

  #29 opened 2 years ago
  1

• Add text to clearly state that existing RDF 1.1 data will remain valid in syntax and semantics.

  #27 opened 5 months ago
  4

• Request expressions of support

  #26 opened 2 years ago
  1

• WG timeline ?

  #25 opened 2 years ago
  1

• Versioning: 1.2 or 2.0?

  #24 opened 2 years ago
  3

• add an explicit rationale about the choice of documents to include

  #28 opened 2 years ago
  0

• Section 1.1 typo

  #21 opened 3 years ago
  1

• add liaison with Sparql 1.2 CG

  #20 opened 3 years ago
  0

• Include RDFa Core 1.2 as a normative specification to deliver

  #19 opened 3 years ago
  8

• update links from draft report to final report

  #16 opened 3 years ago
  1

• add an explicit item about RDF primer in the charter

  #14 opened 3 years ago
  1

• AndyS: add missing SPARQL documents in the charter proposal

  #13 opened 3 years ago
  1

• More liaisons with W3C groups or external organizations?

  #10 opened 3 years ago
  14

• Should the WG only apply editorial errata

  #9 opened 3 years ago
  4

• Consider adding CSVW specifications

  #6 opened 3 years ago
  8

• Add a deliverable (WG note) about "added feature"

  #5 opened 3 years ago
  1

• WG practice

  #3 opened 3 years ago
  2

• Status of RDF/XML.

  #2 opened 3 years ago
  2

• Should RDF-star and SPARQL-star be 2 separate WGs

  #1 opened 3 years ago
  7