Qualitative differences when running the examples
Closed this issue ยท 4 comments
m3at commented
Hi, first thanks a ton for that clean implementation of Mask-RCNN, it's very helpful! ๐
When trying to reproduce the results shown in the inference example, I get qualitatively worst results (see bellow).
I'm running this on a 1070Ti on Ubuntu 18.04, with:
Platform: Linux-4.15.0-39-generic-x86_64-with-Ubuntu-18.04-bionic
Chainer: 5.0.0
NumPy: 1.15.4
CuPy:
CuPy Version : 5.0.0
CUDA Root : /usr
CUDA Build Version : 9010
CUDA Driver Version : 10000
CUDA Runtime Version : 9010
cuDNN Build Version : 7102
cuDNN Version : 7102
NCCL Build Version : 2115
iDeep: Not Available
chainercv: 0.11.0
numpy: 1.15.4
fcn: 6.4.8
It seems that you developed this on Chainer 4.0, but I could not find in the release notes what change in v5 could make this kind of impact.
Do you have any ideas about what specific change could have affect the results?
Alternatively, some other things could be happening on my side that impact the results, I will investigate as soon as I get the time this week and report it here.
Weights from Google Drive
Weights from Caffe2 (image 1)
Weights from Caffe2 (image 2)
wkentaro commented
Sorry. I have no idea at the moment.