rawfilepath
Version: 1.1.0
TL;DR
- Use all "process" and "directory" features
- like
callProcess
orgetDirectoryFiles
- without worrying about
FilePath
encoding issues or performance penalties.
Overview
The unix
package provides RawFilePath
which is a type synonym of ByteString
. Unlike FilePath
(which is String
), it has no performance issues because it is ByteString
. It has no encoding issues because it is ByteString
which is a sequence of bytes instead of characters.
That's all good. With RawFilePath
, we can properly separate the "sequence of bytes" and the "sequence of Unicode characters." The control is yours. Properly encode or decode them with UTF-8 or UTF-16 or any codec of your choice.
However,
- The functions in
unix
are low-level. - The higher-level packages such as
process
anddirectory
are strictly tied toFilePath
.
This library provides the higher-level interface with RawFilePath
.
Advantages
rawfilepath
is easy to use.
{-# language OverloadedStrings #-}
import RawFilePath
import System.IO
import qualified Data.ByteString as B
main :: IO ()
main = do
p <- startProcess $ proc "sed" ["-e", "s/\\>/!/g"]
`setStdin` CreatePipe
`setStdout` CreatePipe
B.hPut (processStdin p) "Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet"
hClose (processStdin p)
result <- B.hGetContents (processStdout p)
print result
-- "Lorem! ipsum! dolor! sit! amet!"
- High performance
- No round-trip encoding issue
- Minimal dependencies (three packages:
bytestring
,unix
, andbase
) - Lightweight library (under 400 total lines of code)
- Type safety (inspired by typed-process)
- Available now
Rationale
Performance
Traditional String
is notorious:
- 24 bytes (three words) required for one character (the List constructor, the actual Char value, and the pointer to the next List constructor). 24x memory consumption.
- Heap fragmentation causing malloc/free overhead
- A lot of pointer chasing for reading: Devastates the cache hit rate
- A lot of pointer chasing plus a lot of heap object allocation for manipulation (appending, slicing, etc.)
- Completely unnecessary but mandatory conversions and memory allocation when the data is sent to or received from the outside world
This already makes us unhappy enough to avoid String
. FilePath
is a type synonym of String
. Use RawFilePath
instead. It's faster and occupies less memory.
Encoding
FilePath
is a type synonym of String
. This is a bigger problem than what String
already has, because it's not just a performance issue anymore; it's a correctness issue as there is no encoding information.
A syscall would give you (or expect from you) a series of bytes, but String
is a series of characters. But how do you know the system's encoding? NTFS is UTF-16, and FAT32 uses the OEM character set. On Linux, there is no filesystem-level encoding. Would Haskell somehow magically figure out the system's encoding information and encode/decode accordingly? Well, there is no magic. FilePath
has completely no guarantee of correct behavior at all, especially when there are non-ASCII letters.
AFPP
In June 2015, three bright Haskell programmers came up with an elegant solution called the Abstract FilePath Proposal and met an immediate thunderous applause. Inspired by this enthusiasm, they further pursued the career of professional Haskell programming and focused on more interesting things. (sigh)
This library provides a stable and high-performance API that is available now.
Documentation
API documentation of rawfilepath on Stackage.
To do
rawfilepath
is stable. We don't expect any backward-incompatible changes. But we do want to port more system functions that are present in process
or directory
. We'll need to be a bit careful about their API for stability, though.
Patches will be highly appreciated.