Add filters to JsonPathBodyFilterBuilder jsonPath

[bata19]

Add filters to:

public static JsonPathBodyFilterBuilder jsonPath(final String jsonPath) {
        return new JsonPathBodyFilterBuilder(compile(jsonPath));
    }

public static JsonPathBodyFilterBuilder jsonPath(final String jsonPath, Predicate... filters) {
        return new JsonPathBodyFilterBuilder(compile(jsonPath, filters));
    }

For example, we can select only leaf element:

jsonPath("$..pets[?]", new Predicate() {
    @Override
    public boolean apply(PredicateContext ctx) {
        Object val = ctx.item();
        return !(val instanceof Map || val instanceof List);
    }
});

[bata19]

Happy to contribute

[kasmarian]

@bata19 if you have a plan in mind how to make the necessary changes, please feel free to open a PR. This is more than welcome.

[pedroluiznogueira]

Anyone working on this one?

[pedroluiznogueira]

Anyone working on this one?

@kasmarian

[kasmarian]

@pedroluiznogueira If @bata19 is not looking into this, then I'd not expect any progress at the moment. I haven't seen PRs yet

[pedroluiznogueira]

@kasmarian may I work on this then?

[bata19]

@pedroluiznogueira Feel free to do it if you have any bandwidth. I could only do it some time at a later point.

[pedroluiznogueira]

Will do! I've got some time to take a look into that.

[github-actions]

In order to prioritize the support for Logbook, we would like to check whether the old issues are still relevant.
This issue has not been updated for over six months.

• Please check if it is still relevant in latest version of the Logbook.
• If so, please add a descriptive comment to keep the issue open.
• Otherwise, the issue will automatically be closed after a week.

[github-actions]

This issue has automatically been closed due to no activities. If the issue still exists in the latest version of the Logbook, please feel free to re-open it.

[pedroluiznogueira]

@kasmarian @whiskeysierra I was searching for a way to contribute to this project and I remembered this issue, is this still worth doing? I took a look and it seems like it's still not supported.

[kasmarian]

@pedroluiznogueira if you find a need for this feature, feel free to reopen this issue and add a PR with your proposal. There was no interest in the issue in the last several months, so the bot closed it.