ArctosDB/arctos

Feature Request - remove identifier type institutional catalog number

Opened this issue Β· 102 comments

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

A new identifier type is being added, an existing type is clearly being mis-used and causing a great deal of confusion, work, and data which cannot do what it is intended to do. From #7808 (comment):

From I am unsure of the status of getting rid of https://arctos.database.museum/info/ctDocumentation.cfm?table=ctcoll_other_id_type#institutional_catalog_number as part of this. I thought we had an agreement and plan, I'm no longer sure. My comments in #7808 (comment) remain valid: there's clearly a great deal of confusion about that type, it is being used for some things that it should not be used for, keeping it around is just going to prolong the pain and make the new thing that much harder to understand. There are 211796 records without valid Arctos record GUIDs using the type at the moment. 128671 of them do have an issued-by agent. (And most of those don't seem to be institutions, if anyone needs any more evidence that this is an arbitrary mess.) I would like to

  1. for those with an issued-by agent:
    • convert the type to identifier
  2. for those without an issued-by agent:
    • create n 'institutional catalog number' agent,
    • update all null issuedby to use that agent, then
    • convert the type to identifier

Note that (2) is in no way a solution, it doesn't magically make these data make sense, it just moves the point of confusion to a hopefully-less-confusing (and more easily documented) place; the identifiers will continue to carry exactly the same amount of information though this process.

Data: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1rNlvoWnDrWeVrxD2nWsMAaFO8x3fmBDQ445sWc8DcGQ/edit#gid=1128266536

@mkoo @Jegelewicz @campmlc please advise and help.

Describe what you're trying to accomplish

Easy access to good data.

Describe the solution you'd like

Remove a nonfunctional point of confusion, https://arctos.database.museum/info/ctDocumentation.cfm?table=ctcoll_other_id_type#institutional_catalog_number

Describe alternatives you've considered

Unnecessary struggle resulting in low-quality data.

Additional context

#7808

Priority

Nothing has seemed more critical to me in a while...

@dustymc I assume that data is old because I've had you fix some of those? (ALMNH for example)

Can we get an updated list?

Yes the data are stale, I just copied from a comment that was getting buried.

I'll pull fresh data, but possibly not until #7808 is implemented (it will clear a lot of clutter).

I will change my priorities if there's any realistic way this can be implemented with #7808, I believe removing what's clearly a point of confusion at that time would be a HUGE benefit, but my current understanding is that this will not be possible.

@dustymc a couple you can clean up now.

All records in https://arctos.database.museum/search.cfm?guid_prefix=APSU%3AHerp&customoidoper=LIST&oidnum=A-

That have identifiers of type institutional catalog number starting with A- should be issued by https://arctos.database.museum/agent/21334600 and can be changed to type identifier

All records in https://arctos.database.museum/search.cfm?guid_prefix=APSU%3AHerp&customoidoper=LIST&oidnum=R-

That have identifiers of type institutional catalog number starting with R- should be issued by https://arctos.database.museum/agent/21352850 and can be changed to type identifier

That have identifiers of type institutional catalog number starting with A- should be issued by https://arctos.database.museum/agent/21334600 and can be changed to type identifier

temp_APSUHerpA.csv.zip

UPDATE 5713

That have identifiers of type institutional catalog number starting with R- should be issued by https://arctos.database.museum/agent/21352850 and can be changed to type identifier

temp_APSUHerpR.csv.zip

UPDATE 2363

@dustymc that is them but missing the issued by for both.

missing the issued by

I updated as you asked?!?

I updated as you asked?!?

I just meant that issued by wasn't in the file you attached.

@campmlc I have placed a bunch of no-data identifiers in the identifier unbulkloader. If you could review and let me know if we can just remove them, that would be super helpful! The are under my username and have the following statuses

DGR Bird
DGR Ento
DGR Mamm
MSB Fish
MSB Herp
MSB Mamm

I think these all got created using a formula in someone's bulkload file. They are either just a bunch of dashes or a letter and some dashes. They don't offer any information and I think it would be good to remove them.

The following marked to autoload in the identifier unbulkloader to remove the legacy data migration institutional catalog number of "M" or "H" etc.
DGR Bird
DGR Ento
DGR Mamm
MSB Fish
MSB Herp
MSB Mamm

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1rNlvoWnDrWeVrxD2nWsMAaFO8x3fmBDQ445sWc8DcGQ/edit#gid=1128266536 is fresh.

Can we PLEASE immediately proceed as outlined in the initial comment, before this taints the new Arctos record GUID type?

@mkoo help?

I would like at least 24 hours to look over this more, and I'm sure other collections are in the same boat. There are complications here that have not been addressed.

@dustymc all of these ALMNH:Inv can be changed to identifier

identifierDownload(24).csv

all of these ALMNH:Inv can be changed to identifier

done

Actually, I have a lot that can be changed. I just didn't ask because I had assumed they would be changed as part of the switch to Arctos record GUID and I'd rather not spend too much time on it. The sheet won't ever properly open because I guess it is too big? Anyway, here are some that you can change immediately for the entire collection:

NMMNH:Paleo
ALMNH:EH
CRCM:Bird
CRCM:Mamm
UTEP:Herp
APSU:Herp
UNM:MET
ASUMZ:Bivalve

Maybe with those gone the list will be easier to work in.

assumed they would be changed as part of the switch to Arctos record GUID

So did I but here we are....

rather not spend too much time on it.

Agree. I can snipe at things if someone wants to deviate from what I laid out up yonder, if not then let's just get this gone before someone else finds themselves all tangled up in the arbitrary again, and anything that needs adjusted can be dealt with at any time.

Anyway, whole collections aren't bad (I hope), I'll run those and repull.

whole collections aren't bad (I hope)

These are all things I either did or had someone do. I can be blamed if anyone yells.

Thanks guys, I'll try to look over MSB ones today. @AdrienneRaniszewski @jldunnum @jtgiermakowski @msbparasites

@dustymc can you update the Google sheet - I'll see if there are any others I can handle.

update the Google sheet

I did

There are still over 96000. Would it be possible to get an explanation as to why this identifier is a problem? These may or may not be in whatever correct format, but like collector numbers they are linked to a formal institutional catalog that in most cases is written down in a ledger somewhere, and is the basis of publication citation. It still feels totally wrong to eliminate this identifier type. @DerekSikes

mkoo commented

Please see my email @campmlc

@dustymc these can be changed to identifier

ALMNH"Geo
ALMNH:Inv
ALMNH:Paleo
ASUMZ:Mamm
UTEP:ES

@mkoo it would pare things down if the MVZ collections could be converted as well.

DLM EDIT

done

@dustymc

There are a bunch of these that I think should be type Arctos record GUID based upon the issued by.

guid_prefix triplet guid other_id_type display_value id_references assigned_agent assigned_date issued_by_agent remarks coll_obj_other_id_num_id
CHAS:Bird CHAS:Bird:7968 https://arctos.database.museum/guid/CHAS:Bird:7968 institutional catalog number 30303 self Jessica Weller 2024-01-12 Denver Museum of Nature & Science   17754573
mkoo commented

@dustymc these can be changed to identifier

ALMNH"Geo ALMNH:Inv ALMNH:Paleo ASUMZ:Mamm UTEP:ES

@mkoo it would pare things down if the MVZ collections could be converted as well.

Sorry-- I thought you knew to do this for MVZ (I'm pretty sure I gave the verbal ok yesterday wtih Carol)- Thanks!

DLM EDIT

MVZ done (and some/many/most of them were clearly people getting lost after the last cleanup).

@dustymc all of the CRCM collections can be changed to identifier, but if they have no issued by, it should be https://arctos.database.museum/agent/21346711

DLM edit

done

@lin-fred the NMMNH:Mamm institutional catalog numbers all appear to be duplicates of the actual catalog number - can they just be removed?

If they are needed, can we change to identifier with issued by https://arctos.database.museum/agent/1014941

I don't think I am the one using those numbers?

See #6881 (comment)

@lin-fred from https://arctos.database.museum/guid/NMMNH:Mamm:4504

image

These are in your records and are redundant?

type Arctos record GUID based upon the issued by.

I'm probably lost, not sure https://arctos.database.museum/guid/CHAS:Bird:7968 (Passerina) has anything to do with https://arctos.database.museum/guid/DMNS:Bird:30303??

OK fair - I didn't look at the DMNS stuff, so these are who knows.....

@lin-fred from https://arctos.database.museum/guid/NMMNH:Mamm:4504

image

These are in your records and are redundant?

Oh that's weird, I definitely did not add those. I've just looked through our bulkupload of mammals excel sheet and those are not in there. Did they get added because of the reciprocal relationship?

I don't need them there, as you said, its duplication of info.

@campmlc @jldunnum

from https://arctos.database.museum/guid/MSB:Mamm:287252

I understand that you want to keep these, so I suggest that they be changed to type= identifier and issued by = https://arctos.database.museum/agent/1014941

These were added before the NMMNH migration to Arctos, using Patty Gegick's Excel file for the catalog number notation, when the records were first cataloged at MSB . They are equivalent to the Arctos record guids linking to NMMNHS now. I'll let @jldunnum respond to how he wants them dealt with.

@dustymc in these records - https://arctos.database.museum/search.cfm?guid_prefix=UWBM%3AMamm&customoidoper=LIST&oidtype=institutional%20catalog%20number&oidnum=WDFW%25

the institutional catalog numbers that start with WDFW can be changed to identifier and issued by should be added as https://arctos.database.museum/agent/21350366

DLM EDIT

done

@dustymc in these records - https://arctos.database.museum/search.cfm?guid_prefix=UWBM%3AMamm&customoidoper=LIST&oidtype=institutional%20catalog%20number&oidnum=MMP%25

the institutional catalog numbers that start with MMP can be changed to identifier and issued by should be added as https://arctos.database.museum/agent/1014687

@campmlc I am unloading these. They are all MSB M - and like the other batches, it looks like they were added as part of some concatenation for which they had nothing to add to the concatenated value.

identifierDownload(25).csv

@dustymc all UWBM:Mamm institutional identifiers can be changed to identifier.

I need fresh data - I keep looking at things I've already cleaned up.

Question as to whether any of this cleanup will affect data in https://arctos.database.museum/info/unreciprocated_relationships.cfm ?

All MSB:Para records related to institutional catalog numbers issued by the MSB:Host collection agent https://arctos.database.museum/agent/21334672 should all be changed to Arctos record guid relationships.

UTEP:Herb
UTEP:Inv

can be changed to identifier

All MSB:Para records related to institutional catalog numbers issued by the MSB:Host collection agent https://arctos.database.museum/agent/21334672 should all be changed to Arctos record guid relationships.

@campmlc I think those are all done.

How about all the MSB:Para that have a relationship to an MSB:Mamm identifier? Many of these are odd duplicates. If there is already a link using the same triplet in the GUID, can we get rid of the triplet identifier?

image

@campmlc and how about these duplications?

https://arctos.database.museum/guid/MSB:Mamm:140646

includes

image

Is that necessary? If so, can we instead say this is an identifier issued by https://arctos.database.museum/agent/21274282

All MSB:Para records related to institutional catalog numbers issued by the MSB:Host collection agent https://arctos.database.museum/agent/21334672 should all be changed to Arctos record guid relationships.

@campmlc I think those are all done.

How about all the MSB:Para that have a relationship to an MSB:Mamm identifier? Many of these are odd duplicates. If there is already a link using the same triplet in the GUID, can we get rid of the triplet identifier?

image

@jldunnum needs to weigh in on those MSB:Mamm institutional catalog numbers. They were duplicated with the urls for a reason.

@campmlc see also SSUC M - in https://arctos.database.museum/loaders/bulkUnLoadIdentifier.cfm

These should all be institutional catalog number issued by https://arctos.database.museum/agent/21352865. I created the agent and added to the example above.

These should not be unloaded until all the records can have a relationship made to this agent's mammal collection.

MSB:Host records related via institutional catalog numbers to any MSB:Para or MSB:Mamm records should also be converted to Arctos record guids.

These should all be institutional catalog number issued by https://arctos.database.museum/agent/21352865. I created the agent and added to the example above.

There is no number? Do you want to keep them?

MSB:Host records related via institutional catalog numbers to any MSB:Para or MSB:Mamm records should also be converted to Arctos record guids.

Those are also done

These should all be institutional catalog number issued by https://arctos.database.museum/agent/21352865. I created the agent and added to the example above.

There is no number? Do you want to keep them?

We need to go through the records and add the issued by collection agent even without the number. Then they can be changed to identifier.

Ditto for all MSB records linked to institutional catalog numbers with prefix "CBF". The issued by agent needs to be added : https://arctos.database.museum/agent/21248995

We need to go through the records and add the issued by collection agent even without the number. Then they can be changed to identifier.

They are in the issued by bulkload tool. https://arctos.database.museum/loaders/bulk_identifier_issuedby.cfm

Ditto for all MSB Mamm linked to AMNH M numbers: issued by agent needs to be added: https://arctos.database.museum/agent/21347734

Ditto for all MSB records linked to institutional catalog numbers with prefix "CBF". The issued by agent needs to be added : https://arctos.database.museum/agent/21248995

in the issued by tool - https://arctos.database.museum/loaders/bulk_identifier_issuedby.cfm

Ditto for all MSB Mamm linked to AMNH M numbers: issued by agent needs to be added: https://arctos.database.museum/agent/21347734

in the issued by loader - https://arctos.database.museum/loaders/bulk_identifier_issuedby.cfm

All MSB linked to DGR anything should have issued by agent as MSB Division of Genomic Resources.
Alll MSB:Mamm linked to USNM should have issued by agent https://arctos.database.museum/agent/21347824

I can't do any more of these tonight. Can we get refreshed data with this info added?

Any MSB linked to UNAM should be issued by agent https://arctos.database.museum/agent/21276001

Ditto for all MSB Mamm linked to AMNH M numbers: issued by agent needs to be added: https://arctos.database.museum/agent/21347734

These were a bit of a mess. Some were formatted as AMNH M xxxxx, some as AMNH xxxxx, some as M-xxxxx. Some had type institutional catalog number, some AMNH: American Museum of Natural History and a few had issued by American Museum of Natural History Mammal Collection. So I downloaded all of these AMNH associated identifiers in all of the formats, determined the unique combinations of Arctos record + AMNH number, and loaded a set of identifiers in the following format:

type number format relationship issued by
identifier AMNH M xxxxx same individual as American Museum of Natural History Mammal Collection

Then I made a file to unload all of the other combinations of identifier that is now in the identifier unload tool with the status MSB AMNH duplicates. I did not actually unload these, because I don't feel that is my place. @campmlc @jldunnum please know that this can be undone if for some reason it must be. The file I used to do this work can be found in Dropbox. DGR Conversion Files > Other ID Fixes > AMNH for MSB Mamm.

Going forward, ALL AMNH identifiers should be added as

type number format relationship issued by
identifier AMNH M xxxxx same individual as American Museum of Natural History Mammal Collection

If we can finish this up and you all can update your data entry workflow, We will be in line with the request at #5886 which will help us get that issue resolved and everything will be more consistent and easy to find. I'm happy to meet up if we need to.

Alll MSB:Mamm linked to USNM should have issued by agent https://arctos.database.museum/agent/21347824

@campmlc @jldunnum

These are all done and for a majority of them I was also able to add a link to the USNM records - see https://arctos.database.museum/guid/MSB:Mamm:281784 as an example. Going forward, you all should add this to your workflow when adding USNM mammal identifiers:

Catalog numbers

Add USNM catalog numbers this way

type number format relationship issued by
identifier USNM xxxxx same individual as Smithsonian Division of Mammals

You can then search those catalog numbers in the USNM database - https://collections.nmnh.si.edu/search/mammals/
Hint: just enter the number in the keyword search field

Links

Add links to USNM records this way

type number format relationship issued by
identifier http://n2t.net/ark:/65665/xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx same individual as Smithsonian Museum of Natural History EZID

In this way you can find the "missing links" which are the records with issued by Smithsonian Division of Mammals but no issued by Smithsonian Museum of Natural History EZID OR the records with an identifier that starts with USNM but not one that starts with http://n2t.net/ark:/65665/.

All MSB linked to DGR anything should have issued by agent as MSB Division of Genomic Resources.

These have all been changed to type = DGR: Division of Genomic Resources (MSB) so that we can deal with them as part of #5773

Any MSB linked to UNAM should be issued by agent https://arctos.database.museum/agent/21276001

All of these identifiers were duplicated

image

I added issued by to the ones that are formatted UNAM xxxxx

The duplicates (fromatted as issued by UNAM with a bare number) are in the unloader https://arctos.database.museum/loaders/bulkUnLoadIdentifier.cfm as MSB UNAM dupes @campmlc @jldunnum you can mark to autoload

Also note that I changed the preferred name of the issuing agent. Commas in agent names can cause problems in parsing identifiers. The new preferred name is Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico Museo de Zoologia and the old one is an aka.

Add UNAM catalog numbers this way

type number format relationship issued by
identifier UNAM xxxxx same individual as Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico Museo de Zoologia

Note however, that all of these have a relationship of self and I would think it should be same individual as if UNAM is also cataloging them. We can ask Dusty to change them if you would rather have them be same individual as

The following would help ensure that everyone is on the same page.

Enter links to other Arctos records as

identifier type identifier
Arctos record GUID https://arctos.database.museum/guid/XXX:Xxxx:12345

using the right type will mean you don't have to select an issued by (Arctos will do it for you) and you will get a link to the existing record.

If the related record doesn't exist, enter

identifier type identifier
identifier XXX:Xxxx:12345

So you can find these and update to a link when the related record gets cataloged.

@dustymc does this appear correct? Can we create a tool to help convert the second case when catalog records finally show up?

The MSB:Para relationships to MSB:Host and MSB:Mamm were all over the place. I found them as bare numbers with an issued by, as triplets with no issued by, and as triplets with issued by.

All of these should now have working links where the related catalog record is in Arctos. BUT there are a bunch of duplicated identifiers like this.

image

The insitututional catalog number identifiers are redundant and can be removed. They are in the identifier unloader as MSB:Mamm record GUID dupe @campmlc @msbparasites you can mark to autoload to remove them.

After all of the unloading gets done, we can ask for fresh data....

No cleanup is required and none has been requested. No information will be lost when the requested actions are performed. Any needed cleanup was needed before this was opened, and can remain needed after the clearly-confounding factor has been removed. Can we proceed with the initial request?

@dustymc have you created the new agent to be used as issued by?

No

May I?

I was thinking of

type preferred name url
organization Institutional Catalog #7836

While my first inclination was to use https://arctos.database.museum/agent/0, this provides everyone the ability to find the things that used to be type institutional catalog number.

PLEASE do whatever will help get us un-stuck from this place that I can't see why we're stuck in!

provides everyone the ability to find the things that used to be type institutional catalog number.

Yes, that's what I was trying to say in #7836 (comment)

(1) (has issuedby) are VERY clearly being used interchangeably, there's nothing to do that I can see.
(2) (no issuedby) are potentially from someone who for some reason hopes this type will convey something, there's an easy way to preserve that. (And hopefully someone will do something better with those poor data, but that doesn't need to stop progress either.)

Do please be verbose in the remarks-or-something - "legacy mess-marker, don't use this for any purpose" or something of the sort - and hopefully we'll be able to bad dup it before anyone does anything irrecoverable....

mkoo commented

While I like the poetic use of "Agent Zero" I think we do need a separate one as you suggest for Institutional Catalog.

If you create it, we can update but a profile of "This is used for legacy records marked with "institutional catalog number". Currently all assignable values are attributed to actual institutions and identifier values. This agent should not be used in the future but is simply a legacy notation" or similar would be helpful

hopefully we'll be able to bad dup it before anyone does anything irrecoverable....

Can't we do that immediately after the transition? It would still show up on the transitioned identifiers, but nobody could use it going forward?

There are still records in the bulkloader with institutional catalog number.

There are still records in the bulkloader with institutional catalog number.

Those can be transitioned as part of this process.

There are still records in the bulkloader with institutional catalog number.

Those can be transitioned as part of this process.

Will this happen automatically or is that the responsibility of the associated collection?

@dustymc see above.

I can update bulkloader with the same path.

Can we move on this? @mkoo HELP!

What is happening here? We use institutional catalog number.

mkoo commented

There's now a good agent that works as a proxy for Institutional Catalog (https://arctos.database.museum/agent/21352872) for when we dont know the institution. Thanks @Jegelewicz for making it.

This will be the Issuedby for all the null Issued by where identifier type is the now deprecated institutional catalog number. The only way that value has value is if there's an explicit Issuedby, and for as many as we can these have been added or cleaned up by all collections. This allows us to do much more automated integration of records. We have a new type Arctos record GUID that can do lots of remarkable things now for Arctos collection triples. If you missed the relationship_bot demo, we have a recording from the AWG meeting.

@dustymc can you confirm that stuff in the bulkloader can be updated by you? or should those be redone by collections (How many records are there @campmlc ?)

There's now a good agent that works as a proxy for Institutional Catalog (https://arctos.database.museum/agent/21352872) for when we dont know the institution. Thanks @Jegelewicz for making it.

This will be the Issuedby for all the null Issued by where identifier type is the now deprecated institutional catalog number. The only way that value has value is if there's an explicit Issuedby, and for as many as we can these have been added or cleaned up by all collections. This allows us to do much more automated integration of records. We have a new type Arctos record GUID that can do lots of remarkable things now for Arctos collection triples. If you missed the relationship_bot demo, we have a recording from the AWG meeting.

@dustymc can you confirm that stuff in the bulkloader can be updated by you? or should those be redone by collections (How many records are there @campmlc ?)

I manually updated the current ones I have access to in MSB:Mamm, but there is continuous data entry going on across divisions at MSB and I imagine there will be others.

bulkloader can be updated by you

yes #7836 (comment)

It would also be super helpful if there were a means in place, or a plan for a means, to deal with temporal lags between cataloging of related items, both current records and future entries, before this goes into effect.

bulkloader can be updated by you

yes #7836 (comment)

Any possibility of getting the Browse and Edit SQL tool functional? Currently not possible for operators to make bulk edits to the bulkloader files. I had to make the edits I performed one record at a time in Browse and Edit. The alternative, downloading, deleting, and rebulkloading, is an enormous amount of work (Excel date formats, for one, and hundreds of empty columns to deal with for another), and provides an open path to introduce error.

mkoo commented

How about a banner display?-- we have had several lags in implementation since this has been on the docket of agendas for a while and we have had a week since we made decisions. I agree though we need to push notifications to people.

I will post a banner to read (suggestions welcomed):
Arctos data entry users: Please do not use identifier type of 'institutional catalog number' as we are creating better tools for Identifiers and it will no longer be available. Instead, ensure that IssuedBy has the proper Institutional Agent (or make one). Please see the updated Handbook: https://handbook.arctosdb.org/how_to/How-to-choose-the-proper-other-identifier-type.html for details.

Issued by is not a substitute for saying that something is a catalog number? All of our institutional catalog numbers should have issuers.

It would also be super helpful if there were a means in place, or a plan for a means, to deal with temporal lags between cataloging of related items, both current records and future entries, before this goes into effect.

#7836 (comment)

It would also be super helpful if there were a means in place, or a plan for a means, to deal with temporal lags between cataloging of related items, both current records and future entries, before this goes into effect.

#7836 (comment)

The only problem with that is during bulkload, operators from one collection do not necessarily know at the time of data entry whether or not the record exists at another collection in order to alter data entry type and workflows. And there should be some automation that would allow these to be converted as matches become available.

When we had the "MSB:Mamm" and "MSB:Para" ID types, we could choose one of those to create the relationship, and if the corresponding record was not yet cataloged, the link would 404, which wasn't great, but at least the relationship was captured. And those could be found and fixed, even by the bot. If we get rid of institutional catalog number and force people to hand-type some version of the catalog number as an "identifier" - how do we prevent loss of data?

When all identifiers are ending up in a single field it makes managing them very difficult. The ability to select specific independant identifiers for display and sorting in their own column is very helpful when managing our collection. We can still do this for our NK number but having that for others is still needed.
For example this morning our funders at USGS just requested a download of the 51K USGS specimen records we hold at the MSB with their Institutional Catalog number. I could not just give them a list that they could easily sort. The United States Geological Survey identifier is currently sitting in with all the other identifiers. Also no option to dispay "issued by" on the customize search & results either.
We have many records that contain multiple identifiers, including multiple institutional catalog numbers that we want to be able to parse out.
For example: MSB:Mamm:124975 collector number EWV 1365 | United States Geological Survey identifier BS/FC 24975 | NCBI BioSample identifier https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/biosample/SAMN23585490 | NK 34841 | U. S. National Park Service catalog SAPU 45036

very difficult


Screenshot 2024-06-24 at 11 04 37
Screenshot 2024-06-24 at 11 04 57
Screenshot 2024-06-24 at 11 05 14
Screenshot 2024-06-24 at 11 19 11

I think what @jldunnum is requesting is the option to parse out selected identifiers and issued by in a separate column in the main search results, as below. I don't think anyone can expect that USGS would be able to figure out how to use our identifiers download with merge option - especially given that attempting this with the 51000+ USGS records and over 100,000 rows of identifiers at MSB results in browser collapse.

image