Issues
- 0
feat(attribute-completeness): add functionality to use multiple attributes and combine them to one filter
#819 opened by sfendrich - 0
Deprecate/Discontinue the reports endpoint
#816 opened by mmerdes - 0
disable zoom for attribute-completeness
#805 opened by Gigaszi - 2
Add integration tests with database connection
#814 opened by matthiasschaub - 0
Do not use two database library
#746 opened by matthiasschaub - 1
Remove unused raster client
#815 opened by matthiasschaub - 0
attribute-completeness: figure shows wrong label
#811 opened by Gigaszi - 1
factor out duplicated code for comparison indicators
#797 opened by Gigaszi - 0
remove size restriction from attribute completeness
#802 opened by Gigaszi - 0
- 1
- 0
- 0
- 0
DB connection error handling
#781 opened by matthiasschaub - 0
Find out how many queries can be cached
#780 opened by Gigaszi - 0
building-comparison: improvements to figure
#776 opened by matthiasschaub - 0
- 1
- 0
building-comparison: add value to legend and clean-up duplicated text during hover
#770 opened by matthiasschaub - 0
- 0
- 0
- 1
building-comparison: on the dashboard it seems like Bremen should be covered by EUBUCCO but the results say otherwise
#749 opened by matthiasschaub - 0
building-comparison: add release date of EUBUCCU and OSM timestamp to plot
#750 opened by matthiasschaub - 0
mapping-saturation: estimated curve decreases instead of increases in a case where very few elements are present
#756 opened by matthiasschaub - 0
- 0
building-comparison: provide more information about what the indicator is about and how it works
#752 opened by matthiasschaub - 0
building-comparison: how to deal with AOI not coveraged by reference dataset
#724 opened by matthiasschaub - 2
docs: provide information about how an indicator is calculated and what the result value is
#706 opened by matthiasschaub - 0
building-comparison: result description shows information multiple times and missing blank spaces
#744 opened by Gigaszi - 0
- 0
Add EUBUCCO description and link to indicator description and coverage geometry so that the dashboard can display those information
#729 opened by matthiasschaub - 0
- 1
build(docker): `docker compose up` build fails
#726 opened by matthiasschaub - 1
test(building-comparison): mock `get_eubucco_coverage_intersection_area` in `test_building_comparison.py`
#734 opened by matthiasschaub - 0
building-comparison: flag the case when OSM has much more (over 100%) then EUBUCCO
#737 opened by matthiasschaub - 1
- 0
building-comparision: clip AOI
#735 opened by matthiasschaub - 0
building-comparison: edge case description string shows ratio instead of percent
#731 opened by Gigaszi - 0
- 0
CA LULC <-> OQAPI Interaction
#740 opened by SlowMo24 - 0
building-comparison: check edge cases functions. Are they doing the same? Can they be collapsed into one?
#736 opened by matthiasschaub - 0
building-completeness: in case of undefined coverage is wrongly formatted as 0.70 not 70%
#738 opened by matthiasschaub - 0
building-comparison: Label seems to be incorrect
#728 opened by mcauer - 0
CRS validation does not cover every valid case and raises an exception unexpectably
#716 opened by matthiasschaub - 0
building-comparison: add timestamp of osm and reference dataset to result figure or description
#725 opened by matthiasschaub - 4
- 0
Add cycle way topic
#715 opened by matthiasschaub - 0
- 2