INCATools/dead_simple_owl_design_patterns

Request: related pattern field

Opened this issue · 2 comments

Simple field we can use to document alternative patterns to the one presented, see here. This will help people finding the correct pattern in case its difficult to make a choice.

Not sure on this one. Patterns are deliberately not hard linked. Even informal links likely to go stale. Can this be achieved autoamtically using pattern.owl?

I think there are two things:

  1. we would like to have something like consider in the yaml. This will be used sparingly and is only introduced once it becomes apparent that two patterns are mixed up to often.
  2. @cmungall has been pointing out the limitations of pattern.owl a lot - think about the inLocation patterns that are logically equivalent to their non-InLocation counterparts..