INSPIRE-MIF/gp-data-service-linking-simplification

Issues

• Mismatch between INSPIRE <gmd:protocol> label and OGC preferred label

  #68 opened 2 years ago by jsaligoe
  7

• Is this simplification included in the validator?

  #75 opened a year ago by IoannaTsakalakidou
  6

• Good Pracitce: Data Service Linking Simplification - diagrams missing / with broken links

  #74 opened a year ago by GDIAnja
  2

• TG Download - Data-service linking simplification for WFS

  #58 opened a year ago by heidivanparys
  1

• TG View - Data-service linking simplification for WMS

  #59 opened a year ago by heidivanparys
  1

• TG Metadata - Data-service linking simplification for ISO/TS 19139:2007 metadata

  #60 opened a year ago by heidivanparys
  2

• Question changes TG Download regarding Atom

  #62 opened 2 years ago by heidivanparys
  6

• TG Download - Data-service linking simplification for Atom

  #63 opened 2 years ago by heidivanparys
  3

• Part B - Remapping of Extended Capabilities - About Supported languages

  #43 opened 2 years ago by jescriu
  13

• Part B - Remapping of Extended Capabilities - About Metadata date

  #42 opened 2 years ago by AntoRot
  15

• Part B - Remapping of Extended Capabilities - About Metadata Point of Contact

  #41 opened 2 years ago by AntoRot
  18

• Part B - Remapping of Extended Capabilities - About temporal reference

  #40 opened 2 years ago by AntoRot
  14

• Spatial data service category

  #47 opened 2 years ago by heidivanparys
  4

• Keyword mapping for keywords from thesauri (WFS)

  #46 opened 2 years ago by heidivanparys
  3

• Duplicate requirements / reorganisation requirements classes

  #45 opened 2 years ago by heidivanparys
  7

• Part B - Remapping of Extended Capabilities - About conformity issue

  #39 opened 2 years ago by AntoRot
  19

• Part B - Remapping of Extended Capabilities - About Keywords

  #67 opened 2 years ago by MarieLambois
  4

• contributing to Evidence of implementation & support

  #57 opened 2 years ago by jsaligoe
  1

• Missing requirements on the presence of a view service and download service

  #48 opened 2 years ago by heidivanparys
  12

• harmonised versus as-is datasets

  #6 opened 2 years ago by oberseri
  18

• Referencing a specific layer/feature type in capabilities

  #14 opened 2 years ago by pvgenuchten
  6

• Figure in 7.2 Resources

  #44 opened 2 years ago by heidivanparys
  11

• Scenary 2: Avoiding Service Metadata files and use <inspire_common:Conformity>

  #9 opened 2 years ago by LauraAlemany
  2

• endpoint versus accesspoint

  #7 opened 2 years ago by oberseri
  6

• Additional entries in terms and definitions

  #49 opened 2 years ago by heidivanparys
  2

• Part B - Question tables in Annex B

  #50 opened 2 years ago by heidivanparys
  3

• Use of the `gmd:function` element to distinguish the INSPIRE operations

  #10 opened 2 years ago by ukiz
  10

• ApplicationProfile use

  #17 opened 2 years ago by idevisser
  2

• conformity indicator of network services

  #12 opened 2 years ago by idevisser
  4

• protocol label

  #11 opened 2 years ago by idevisser
  4

• Coupled resource implementation is not compliant

  #38 opened 2 years ago by MarieLambois
  5

• Comment on final proposal - Dataset metadata change

  #16 opened 2 years ago by MarieLambois
  1

• Add a requirement about the combination of protocol and applicationProfile

  #25 opened 2 years ago by AntoRot
  4

• Comments on the section 8.2

  #30 opened 2 years ago by AntoRot
  2

• Comments and proposals on the open issues

  #13 opened 2 years ago by AntoRot
  10

• Italian approach

  #8 opened 2 years ago by AntoRot
  3

• Part B - Remapping of Extended Capabilities - About Unique Resource Identifier (inspire_dls:SpatialDataSetIdentifier)

  #52 opened 2 years ago by heidivanparys
  10

• Part A

  #54 opened 2 years ago by hallinpihlatie
  3

• Clarify what label to use for <gmd:protocol> element

  #23 opened 3 years ago by AntoRot
  3

• Labels expressed in the metadata language

  #24 opened 3 years ago by AntoRot
  1

• Implementation of service linking: evidence, concerns, and recommendation

  #20 opened 3 years ago by jsaligoe
  0

• Distinguish between requirements and recommendations

  #22 opened 3 years ago by AntoRot
  2

• coupled ressources

  #5 opened 3 years ago by oberseri
  5

• Requirement: <srv:operatesOn> element and Requirement: <wms:MetadataURL> and <wfs:MetadataURL> elements

  #28 opened 3 years ago by idevisser
  1

• Normative references

  #27 opened 3 years ago by idevisser
  1

• example WFS downloadable dataset

  #29 opened 3 years ago by idevisser
  1

• Wrong reference to the TG Requirement 1.8

  #21 opened 3 years ago by AntoRot
  1

• No requirements for <gmd:name> element

  #26 opened 3 years ago by AntoRot
  1

• simplification of service md

  #4 opened 3 years ago by oberseri
  2

• "virtual datasets"

  #3 opened 3 years ago by oberseri
  2