Are the `random_sampling` and `sampling_primitives` examples redundant?
Opened this issue · 2 comments
Bevy version
main
What you did
cargo run --example random_sampling
Added in #13507
cargo run --example sampling_primitives
Added in #13519
What went wrong
These examples appear to be extremely similar, and their docs even have identical descriptions.
//! This example shows how to sample random points from primitive shapes.
Additional information
It appears that this isn't a mistake, so I would suggest updating the description of either or both examples to explain what each of them is accomplishing.
But they seem totally redundant to me, so removing one may be an option.
I vote redundant. Remove sampling_primitives.
For some context: I originally wrote the random_sampling example just to demonstrate what ShapeSample was and how to use it. The intention of sampling_primitives (which came shortly after) was to show off the range of primitives for which this sampling feature was supported. I don't have strong feelings about whether one of them gets removed or something. :)