cjph8914/2020_benfords

Issues

• Time series analysis?

  #28 opened 2 years ago by 1e100
  9

• I need a solution. Inforgot my passcode to iCloud, and I tried to guess Many times and now is activation lock. Helllpppppppp

  #34 opened 3 years ago by carlam04
  1

• Why is the Biden Election Day vote data nearly Gaussian ?

  #31 opened 4 years ago by charlesmartin14
  29

• Election Fraud Data Check of Dr. Shiva

  #38 opened 4 years ago by chavenor
  25

• 1,2,3 digit Benford plots for Texas (2020 to 1992 presidential elections) using county aggregated counts

  #41 opened 4 years ago by bd271828
  3

• Strongest Evidence there was election fraud.

  #42 opened 4 years ago by chavenor
  0

• Analyze same data with different base values

  #6 opened 4 years ago by zigster64
  2

• Data availability

  #14 opened 4 years ago by aham41
  2

• Does anybody have a dataset known to be fraudulent?

  #15 opened 4 years ago by dshield55
  5

• Chicago data source

  #22 opened 4 years ago by yychenca
  2

• Code to mass process the data

  #4 opened 4 years ago by FraudAnalysis
  1

• Data from multiple providers?

  #37 opened 4 years ago by tomdotcash
  2

• The average ward in Milwaukee has 750 votes, how would Biden have 100-200 in 30% of wards?

  #36 opened 4 years ago by dlb8685
  14

• Milwaukee ward sizes are small and there is a highly preferred candidate

  #17 opened 4 years ago by frycast
  83

• Add a Way to Simulate an Election With Given Parameters

  #39 opened 4 years ago by snex
  2

• Starting and working on new repository

  #40 opened 4 years ago by bd271828
  0

• For numbers summed to 100%, there can be no such thing that only one member doesn't follow Benford's rule.

  #13 opened 4 years ago by szabolcsvelkei
  17

• 2BL test more appropiate for appropriate for election fraud

  #35 opened 4 years ago by Enclavet
  2

• Looking at vote counts instead of first digits shows why this is not evidence of fraud

  #9 opened 4 years ago by MechanicalTim
  26

• Allegheny, PA absentee votes, second digit

  #27 opened 4 years ago
  24

• Breakdown by vote type

  #32 opened 4 years ago by snex
  8

• Benfords law regarding election data needs to use the second digit analysis

  #30 opened 4 years ago by tehmikey
  1

• You might want to quantify the deviation of data from the Benford's law for each graph

  #33 opened 4 years ago by yurivict
  0

• 2016 and 2012 comparisons

  #3 opened 4 years ago by tomose
  4

• Understanding the plot

  #20 opened 4 years ago by krist-jin
  9

• Plans for expansion?

  #7 opened 4 years ago by JacobRPrice
  3

• Florida is benford law

  #18 opened 4 years ago by korentzari
  3

• For comparison...

  #26 opened 4 years ago by MatthiasWinkelmann
  0

• According to my research second-digit tests are more reliable for detecting election fraud

  #12 opened 4 years ago by draeder
  12

• Research suggests Benford is unreliable in Election Fraud Detection

  #11 opened 4 years ago by mlamias
  9

• Reach out to the voter integrity project

  #21 opened 4 years ago by CoderKing2020
  1

• Some more ideas based on infamous examples from other countries

  #19 opened 4 years ago by blajer
  8

• Failure to take account for external factors

  #5 opened 4 years ago by sfxworks
  9

• Paper suggests that even second-digit analysis cannot be used

  #16 opened 4 years ago
  1

• Analyzing the second leading digit makes all the results look non-conforming

  #10 opened 4 years ago by dogweather
  3

• What is the typical variance for applications of Benford's law?

  #8 opened 4 years ago by CollinQuiason
  0

• Registered voters & number of ballots

  #2 opened 4 years ago by andrew2915
  0