use of 8092 rather than 8192 for accelleration scale
Opened this issue · 1 comments
btsimonh commented
Version
?
Describe the bug
Simple one this time :).
typo in code.. 8092 rather than 8192!!!!
Reproduce
Search the code for 8092.
Expected behavior
should be 8192.
Additional context
probably does not cause any operational issues as accelleration is generally used for getting the direction of gravity.
libdriver commented
Thank you for your suggestions. We will fix this problem in the next routine update.