openfoodfacts/openfoodfacts-server

๐Ÿ‘ Top Issues Dashboard

github-actions opened this issue ยท 5 comments

A simple dashboard that lists the top issues/bugs/features and pull requests.

Top issues

  1. #2891 ๐Ÿ‘17
  2. #5675 ๐Ÿ‘5
  3. #3426 ๐Ÿ‘5
  4. #5561 ๐Ÿ‘4
  5. #4264 ๐Ÿ‘4
  6. #9944 ๐Ÿ‘3
  7. #9710 ๐Ÿ‘3
  8. #9426 ๐Ÿ‘3
  9. #9226 ๐Ÿ‘3
  10. #9012 ๐Ÿ‘3
  11. #5205 ๐Ÿ‘3
  12. #3974 ๐Ÿ‘3
  13. #3824 ๐Ÿ‘3
  14. #2552 ๐Ÿ‘3
  15. #1288 ๐Ÿ‘3
  16. #622 ๐Ÿ‘3
  17. #376 ๐Ÿ‘3
  18. #367 ๐Ÿ‘3
  19. #10705 ๐Ÿ‘2
  20. #10387 ๐Ÿ‘2

Top PRs

  1. #9251 ๐Ÿ‘2
  2. #10007 ๐Ÿ‘1
  3. #9966 ๐Ÿ‘1
  4. #9295 ๐Ÿ‘1
  5. #5639 ๐Ÿ‘1

Created by the rickstaa/top-issues-action action (last update: 10/30/2024, 12:22:24 AM).

@CharlesNepote "automated Quick Wins"

Yes great, @teolemon. The issue is that you have just one point per issue, but better done than perfect.

@teolemon First of all, thanks for trying out my action. I created it to better manage the issues in https://github.com/anuraghazra/github-readme-stats, but, amazingly, people are trying whether it also works for their projects. @CharlesNepote Feel free to create a feature request or pull request if you think the issue can still be improved ๐Ÿš€.

@rickstaa thanks a lot for your nice project.

We have tried another method to sort issues: each participant has 100 credits quarterly and he can put them on the issue(s) he wants to. He can put 100 credits on one issue or allocate it on several issues. It allows the participants to express their priorities, which is not possible with the Github system (where all your "votes" are equal). The drawback of this method is that we need to do it by hand :(

I don't know if it's possible to parse Github issues' comments, but we could use a system where people would vote with a simple syntax, something like:
#My_credits_for_this_issue: 80
The parser might detect the hashtag and its corresponding amount, the user and the date of the comment. This way, it might be possible to establish a ranking based on people priorities. Do you think it's possible?

I have opened an issue on your repository: anuraghazra/github-readme-stats#2193

@CharlesNepote Thanks for your feature request. I could not migrate your issue to https://github.com/rickstaa/top-issues-action, so I made a reference and answered it on rickstaa/top-issues-action#94 (comment). If you have other suggestions on how we can implement this feature without hitting the problems described in that issue, feel free to comment ๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿป.