Problems matching comments
Closed this issue · 4 comments
manulera commented
Two types of problems:
- systematic_id missing from change log
- two comments that end up on the same change (resulting in line duplication)
The problem seems to be that some features did not have \systematic_id and had \gene instead. Opening a branch from master to fix this.
manulera commented
usp108 change is the same in both comments.
manulera commented
SPBC16E9.16c also, so the changes can be merged
manulera commented
These are not exactly the same, but were done at the same time, so they are a single change really:
SPBC4.02c complement(join(2369064..2369160, 2369246..2369416, 2369455..2371243, 2371351..2371451, 2371507..2371583)) complement(join(2369064..2369190, 2369246..2369416, 2369455..2371243, 2371351..2371451, 2371507..2371583)) Solexa transread data; changed accceptor for final intron, improved homology 2008-05-02
SPBC4.02c complement(join(1185617..1186640, 1186738..1186846, 1187087..1187324)) complement(join(1185617..1186640, 1186738..1186846, 1187087..1187162, 1187220..1187324)) Solexa transread data; added in-frame splice to first (existing) exon, improved homology 2008-05-02