Feedback on RISC-V Trace Control Interface Specification - Chapter 5

[ved-rivos]

Section 5

1. See note about moving the description of this register to the section 4.3
2. "The major version...should change" -> "The major version is incremented
   when the modification breaks backward compatibility". " The minor version
   is incremented when the modification maintains backward compatibility"
3. "Versions must be always.." -> is that a guideline for software? If so
   it should not be normative specfication.
4. The long list of examples should be specified as a rule instead of specifying
   through examples.
   "Software should use the major version number to determine its compatibility
   with the component's implementation. Software that was implemented to be
   compatible with a major version may continue to operate even if the minor
   version of the component is higher than the version it was designed for.
   This is because minor versions, including experimental minor versions, are
   backward-compatible."
   The rest of the specification about causing warnings and aborts should not
   be normative.
5. The note about what software should do is not useful as it does not add any
   information about this specification and is generally best practice that
   people versed in the art would know.

[mipsrobert]

All notes to Control PDF handled in 1.0.0_rc20.