swcarpentry/modern-scientific-authoring
How to write, publish, and review scientific papers in the early 21st Century
PythonNOASSERTION
Issues
- 0
On Markdown vs. LaTeX and more
#48 opened - 0
Incorporate comments from notes.txt
#47 opened - 0
- 0
Talk about preprints
#45 opened - 0
- 0
Citing software
#43 opened - 1
journals don't add value
#42 opened - 0
doi2bib
#41 opened - 0
Is the source ok?
#40 opened - 0
Talk about depsy
#39 opened - 0
ACharbonneau on LaTeX
#38 opened - 0
Talk about alt metrics
#37 opened - 0
Describe DOIs
#36 opened - 1
Refrain from moral judgements
#35 opened - 0
- 0
- 0
Serial versus parallel workflows
#31 opened - 1
- 14
Opinions about org-mode?
#29 opened - 1
onedrive live
#28 opened - 0
- 1
Mention RMarkdown?
#26 opened - 7
workflow for reviewing changes
#25 opened - 1
- 0
Complex workflows
#23 opened - 2
Mention reStructuredText (and others?)
#22 opened - 2
Mention CommonMark (?)
#21 opened - 1
Mention LyX (?)
#20 opened - 5
Better example of rigidity
#19 opened - 6
Long-winded
#18 opened - 0
- 4
(Pre-)Historical context is distracting
#16 opened - 1
01-mess: Soften "decency"
#15 opened - 5
- 0
Comments on mess.md, commit 20868b7
#13 opened - 0
- 9
- 0
- 1
- 0
- 0
Warn people about .nojekyll
#7 opened - 0
Using Microsoft Word with Git
#5 opened - 0
Improve description of this repo
#1 opened