tc39/proposal-decorators

Issues

• Intercept class field get/set (without accessor on prototype)

  #530 opened a month ago by trusktr
  13

• change the `bound` example from this[name] = `this[name].bind(this)` to `this[name] = target.bind(this)` for supporting Private properties

  #532 opened 16 days ago by PupilTong
  0

• Clarification. Can auto-accessors be redeclared?

  #531 opened 17 days ago by lpardosixtosMs
  2

• feature request (separate proposal?): `context.addPostInitializer()`

  #521 opened 6 months ago by trusktr
  18

• Clarification on field vs. method destination

  #529 opened 2 months ago by evanw
  8

• Add target class to the context

  #517 opened 8 months ago by xaviergonz
  6

• Timeline / proposal for extensions?

  #506 opened a year ago by matthew-dean
  8

• Dangling decorationState.[[Finished]] when throwing

  #500 opened a year ago by camillobruni
  9

• Motivation section

  #475 opened 5 months ago by pirfalt
  3

• Transpiler guidance section update?

  #485 opened 5 months ago by thw0rted
  2

• addInitializer comment is outdated in README.md

  #501 opened 5 months ago by camillobruni
  1

• Readme text and types are outdated against actual spec

  #522 opened 5 months ago by phiresky
  2

• Write upgrade guide for previous iterations to Stage 3

  #526 opened 5 months ago by pzuraq
  0

• Towards stage 4

  #512 opened 5 months ago by ReinsBrain
  14

• Implementation Status

  #476 opened 2 years ago by jkrems
  9

• Using accessors makes code less clean and readable

  #507 opened 5 months ago by farwayer
  21

• Can't dynamically set private field in initializer

  #509 opened a year ago by mbrowne
  17

• Context.private doesn't seem to support group accessor

  #510 opened 5 months ago by bigopon
  1

• Field and Accessor initializers should run after the field/accessor has been defined

  #513 opened 5 months ago by pzuraq
  12

• Was there a purpose for non-lexical ordering of decorator applications?

  #524 opened 5 months ago by pzuraq
  2

• Field decorator initializer should support configurable field

  #523 opened 5 months ago by sant123
  8

• It isn't clear when `addInitializer` functions are called on class decorator

  #519 opened 7 months ago by waterplea
  2

• Order of execution

  #518 opened 7 months ago by tiansh
  3

• Idea: syntax for decorator composition.

  #515 opened 9 months ago by trusktr
  3

• How to exclude methods from class decorator

  #516 opened 8 months ago by arendjr
  2

• Stage 3 cannot access the class for static method decorator

  #514 opened 9 months ago by cnwangjie
  3

• Counterintuative ordering when using `accessor` in combination with `init` methods

  #508 opened a year ago by pgoforth
  37

• Support changing the backing field used by auto-accessors

  #511 opened a year ago by zaygraveyard
  2

• Leave natural `this` in the decorator functions

  #487 opened a year ago by pabloalmunia
  7

• Home object bug and implementation issues

  #497 opened a year ago by syg
  7

• SetFunctionName - problems and inconsistencies

  #502 opened a year ago by Jamesernator
  7

• Normative updates to the spec, March 2023

  #499 opened a year ago by pzuraq
  7

• The stage 3 design is not transpiler friendly.

  #504 opened a year ago by weiqj
  2

• Stage 3 allow decorators to generate PJOs

  #505 opened a year ago by Giwayume
  1

• We are blocking future possibility by allowing decorators before `export`

  #503 opened a year ago by trusktr
  7

• `context.access` API implementation feedback.

  #494 opened a year ago by rbuckton
  19

• How to transform legacy decorator to current decorator specification?

  #496 opened a year ago by janryWang
  0

• Rename `.name`?

  #495 opened a year ago by rauschma
  1

• Question: is auto-accessor compatible with Proxy?

  #493 opened a year ago by jods4
  3

• Decorating standard functions

  #491 opened 2 years ago by silkentrance
  2

• Is node 20, going to implement decorators?

  #490 opened 2 years ago by akwotom
  3

• Proposal suggestion: an extension for annotation decorators

  #489 opened 2 years ago by matthew-dean
  2

• can private `accessor`s finally solve private fields being undefined before field initializtion?

  #480 opened 2 years ago by trusktr
  13

• If a non-constructable value is returned, then an error is thrown?

  #482 opened 2 years ago by trusktr
  5

• How to collect decorated elements info after class defination?

  #488 opened 2 years ago by ruojianll
  2

• What is this in the decorator function?

  #486 opened 2 years ago by pabloalmunia
  2

• Are we supposed to be able to access the private field of an accessor?

  #481 opened 2 years ago by trusktr
  7

• Static/member methods cannot access the replaced decorated class

  #477 opened 2 years ago by xaviergonz
  5

• Way to distinguish the current decorator implementation from the others at runtime?

  #479 opened 2 years ago by xaviergonz
  3

• Reactive/observable field without "accessor"?

  #478 opened 2 years ago by xaviergonz
  4