Pinned issues
Issues
- 6
- 19
- 8
- 1
- 2
- 2
- 22
@noneumerable decorator?
#386 opened - 2
- 5
- 4
- 9
- 8
Is it possible to combine decorators?
#381 opened - 62
- 2
- 6
@logger with private method, is it possible?
#377 opened - 2
Experimental Transpiler
#376 opened - 2
metadata with getter/setter
#375 opened - 2
@init:decorator accessor field
#374 opened - 6
- 3
AST tool for current specification
#372 opened - 2
Metadata for "constructor"
#370 opened - 6
prop and a property with key "prop"
#369 opened - 1
metadata and inheritance
#368 opened - 2
@init: and prop output normalization
#367 opened - 2
Access with private method
#366 opened - 9
- 9
- 5
- 3
Should `prop` be its own proposal?
#358 opened - 14
- 45
Alternatives for the `prop` keyword
#356 opened - 12
@prop: and @init: vs prop and init
#355 opened - 3
Decorators for plain functions
#353 opened - 3
- 1
Don't use an out parameter context.metadata
#351 opened - 2
[Question] Parameter decorators in setters
#350 opened - 1
Update detailed semantics in the explainer
#349 opened - 12
- 8
@lazy decorator
#347 opened - 1
- 1
- 4
Metadata decorator Inheritability behaviour?
#343 opened - 4
- 7
@override decorator for class fields.
#341 opened - 2
Vote for block decorators!
#340 opened - 7
- 7
Suggestion: Metadata-only field decorators, introduce "auto-property" syntax/grouped accessors
#338 opened - 8
- 2
@tracked example has missing variable
#335 opened - 13