tc39/proposal-operator-overloading

Issues

• Please do this!!

  #63 opened 6 months ago by matthew-dean
  1

• The second bullet of "How does this proposal compare to operator overloading in other languages?" in the Q&A is unclear.

  #47 opened 3 years ago by dead-claudia
  0

• Operator overloading class syntax using TS-like method overloading and "extension" classes

  #29 opened 4 years ago by sirisian
  7

• Suggestion: operator() and operator new

  #52 opened 3 years ago by yw662
  17

• [IDEA] operator overloading via Proxy traps

  #54 opened 2 years ago by Haringat
  1

• Implicitly overloaded operators and sanity restrictions

  #53 opened 3 years ago by jhmaster2000
  0

• Problems with with

  #55 opened 2 years ago by Haringat
  12

• [SUGGESTION] Enable discussions tab

  #58 opened 2 years ago by FrameMuse
  0

• [IDEA] Define operators only in classes

  #57 opened 2 years ago by FrameMuse
  5

• Wildcard suggestion - new `====` and `>===` operators

  #48 opened 3 years ago by suspiciousfellow
  3

• Suggesion: Define Operators with functions

  #56 opened 2 years ago by Haringat
  11

• Trouble using the plugin

  #59 opened 2 years ago by XiaofanLinUS
  0

• Is the proposal still considered ?

  #45 opened 4 years ago by TheEpicFace007
  8

• Predictability goals are confusing

  #36 opened 4 years ago by Zekfad
  3

• API doesn't work with class private member proposal

  #43 opened 4 years ago
  3

• Importing specific operators

  #42 opened 4 years ago
  2

• Overloading operators ++ and --

  #8 opened 6 years ago by jakobkummerow
  3

• Consider operators for controlling "truthiness" of a value.

  #16 opened 5 years ago by rbuckton
  10

• <=> starship operator for unified overloading of comparison operators

  #24 opened 5 years ago by c69
  4

• import overloads into the current module (scope overload to a module) with import attributes?

  #30 opened 4 years ago by trusktr
  7

• [IDEA] what is we remove commutativity ?

  #25 opened 5 years ago by lifaon74
  22

• Deprecating and remove implicit type coerision with adding operator overloading

  #33 opened 4 years ago by redradist
  3

• The syntax should be scoped to a block instead of a module

  #40 opened 4 years ago by Jack-Works
  6

• Object with overloads vs ordinary Object

  #49 opened 3 years ago by lightmare
  1

• Use local order instead of global OperatorCounter

  #51 opened 3 years ago by bergus
  0

• QuickJS implementation

  #50 opened 3 years ago by dy
  0

• Operator overloading breaks Asm.js

  #41 opened 4 years ago
  4

• [IDEA] Symbols

  #26 opened 5 years ago by jcubic
  9

• This seems a little too decorator-y

  #5 opened 3 years ago by dead-claudia
  13

• Implementation Example (pro-implementation case)

  #46 opened 3 years ago by 0X-JonMichaelGalindo
  0

• Use a mathematical definition of operators, decoupled from class definitions

  #44 opened 4 years ago by PaulKiddle
  3

• suggestion - forbid overloading division-operator `/` to guard against divsion-by-nan/zero footguns

  #37 opened 4 years ago by kaizhu256
  2

• BABEL_TRANSFORM_ERROR: Error while transpiling with Babel

  #38 opened 4 years ago by HarryVTripathi
  0

• Why is the explicit with declaration required?

  #3 opened 6 years ago by peey
  6

• It's already possible to overload the arithmetic operators +-*/

  #35 opened 4 years ago by pyrocto
  2

• Have you looked how it works in other languages ?

  #32 opened 4 years ago by jonatjano
  0

• Explain integrity/predictability goals better in the explainer

  #28 opened 5 years ago by littledan
  1

• Consider use with `Object.is` and `Array.isArray` (or a tap listener)

  #23 opened 5 years ago by achung89
  6

• Consider some Object.defineOperator and Symbols

  #21 opened 5 years ago by lifaon74
  4

• Operator overloading work plan

  #20 opened 5 years ago by littledan
  0

• Transfer this to tc39

  #19 opened 5 years ago by littledan
  1

• Discussion: Operator overloading as alternative to extensible numeric literals

  #18 opened 5 years ago by rbuckton
  5

• Will `with operators from X` prevent polymorphism?

  #14 opened 5 years ago by miyaokamarina
  21

• Consider syntactic declaration of operators

  #15 opened 5 years ago by rbuckton
  18

• Consider the confusion around `==` vs `===`

  #17 opened 5 years ago by styfle
  4

• Minimal version of this - Numeric Types Only

  #11 opened 6 years ago by c69
  5

• What about mention AssemblyScript in "Cross-language comparison"?

  #9 opened 6 years ago by MaxGraey
  1

• Adding temperature quantities can cause surprising results.

  #6 opened 6 years ago by mikesamuel
  6

• String `+` right operand optimization

  #4 opened 6 years ago by mikesamuel
  3