tc39/proposal-private-fields-in-in

Issues

• Path to Stage 4!

  #7 opened 3 years ago by ljharb
  9

• in test

  #16 opened 4 years ago by meyerweb
  6

• Feedback on alternatives?

  #4 opened 5 years ago by ljharb
  9

• Update readme to clearly mark chosen solution and its behaviour

  #15 opened 4 years ago by rpamely
  0

• Some thoughts about this proposal

  #12 opened 4 years ago by hax
  8

• Explicit first class private name alternative

  #11 opened 4 years ago by littledan
  18

• Is it better to use try expressions?

  #9 opened 4 years ago by mantou132
  2

• No need to support strong class inheritance checks here

  #14 opened 4 years ago by aimingoo
  3

• Class brand

  #13 opened 4 years ago by dcleao
  26

• `in` does not preclude shorthand?

  #2 opened 5 years ago by bmeck
  11

• Forbidding references to undeclared privates

  #5 opened 5 years ago by jridgewell
  2

• Object.hasBrand(obj, cls) alternative design

  #3 opened 5 years ago by jorendorff
  23