GH Discussions discussion
joshmoore opened this issue · 8 comments
Following on from comments like zarr-developers/zarr-specs#244 (comment) (and my general poor ability to make use of GH Discussions), I've reviewed which repositories in the zarr-developers organization have GH Discussions turned on:
| Repo | Count | Purpose | Proposals |
|---|---|---|---|
| Org level | 5 | Catch-all | 1, 4, ??? |
| Blog | 4 | Used for blog discussions | Keep (only for blog) |
| Benchmark | 6 | WG discussion | Keep (WG only) |
| community | N/A | Redirects to Org | N/A |
| zarr-python | Lots | Misc (some spec stuff) | 2, 3, 4, ??? |
| zarr-specs | 3 | impl/specs | 3, 4, ??? |
| ZEPs | 1 | "request review" | 3, 4, ??? |
Clarifications:
- Slightly confusingly, Discussions for this repo (https://github.com/zarr-developers/community/discussions) redirects to https://github.com/orgs/zarr-developers/discussions.
- If Discussions are subsequently disabled for a repo, they disappear, so before doing that we would need to transfer them.
My personal feeling is the reducing the number of places that there can be Discussions is a Good Thing™️. A low-hanging fruit is to combine zarr-specs and ZEPs.
Beyond that, some options I can see are:
- No big change; don't worry about this now.
- Only org-level discussions
- Discussions on zarr-python and org-level (includes specs)
- Discussions on zarr-python and somewhere spec-y
- Discussions on zarr-python, somewhere spec-y, and org-level (as the catch-all)
- Use Issues everywhere.
Feel free to add more options and/or list your thoughts.
Pinging @zarr-developers/steering-council @zarr-developers/implementation-council @zarr-developers/python-core-devs @zarr-developers/community-manager
If no one is particularly worried about this, I'm inclined to move forward with collapsing discussions that we can (esp. ZEPs & zarr-specs), but if, e.g., the zarr-python teams want to keep separate discussions, then 👍.
I'm not too worried. Discussions are like issues without a specific problem to be fixed - I use them about the same. If someone watches a repo, they will get notifications about both types equally, I think (is probably configurable).
I favor keeping discussions around for zarr-python. I find that usage questions are much easier to manage there and like having the ability to transfer open-ended issues to discussions as a matter of house keeping.
If its possible to combine discussions around zeps and the spec, that seems like a reasonable thing to do.
👍 to keeping zarr-python discussions standalone and consolidating others.
In zarr-developers/zeps#55 I made a specific proposal about how to streamline the ZEP / spec discussion process. Do we feel like that suggestion is actionable?
@MSanKeys963 is working on changes to ZEP0.
My personal preference is to nuke all GH discussions. I hate the threading because it's impossible to know if multiple threads have been updated since you last looked. I'm generally ok with using closed issues for long-running discussions that don't need code fixing etc.
But, that's just my 2c. 😉
My personal preference is to nuke all GH discussions. I hate the threading because it's impossible to know if multiple threads have been updated since you last looked. I'm generally ok with using closed issues for long-running discussions that don't need code fixing etc.
But, that's just my 2c. 😉
@jni although I don't think we are putting github discussions under enough load to cause the problems you describe, suppose we were -- what would you recommend as an alternative? And (here's the hard part), how would you recommend we get everyone to use it?
As I mentioned, good ol' issues, which makes it trivial for people to participate. (There's also Discourse but that has a much higher activation energy.)