cvra/can-bootloader

Global code review

antoinealb opened this issue · 7 comments

@Stapelzeiger said we should do a code review of the bootloader. Should we do it before it is finished ?

nuft commented

I'm for doing it before. It's more efficient.

On Dec 16, 2014, at 4:56 PM, Antoine Albertelli notifications@github.com wrote:

@Stapelzeiger https://github.com/Stapelzeiger said we should do a code review of the bootloader. Should we do it before it is finished ?


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub #21.

Something formal ? Like printing the whole code and highlighting the "wrong" parts ? If we do something less formal we will need a volunteer !

if you want i can help you with the code review (= (for example tomorrow)

I'll review the code. I'll probably have time between Christmas and New-Year.
I was thinking about commenting the code and give you the diff. (I need ctags/search function since I'm not familiar with the codebase.)

I am ok with whatever method for code review. Maybe fork it and open a PR with your comment and fixes ?

any updates on this ?

I couldn't find the time to do a full review. I only took a quick look at the code. On first impression it looks OK, but there are some checks missing.
I guess as soon as it works we should move to the next thing since we still have quite a lot to do. For a later version (next year) we should probably improve a few things and I'd still like to do a full review sometime, but it's currently not on my priority list.