TSCAD

Constructive Solid Geometry (CSG) using Signed Distance Functions (SDF) and Typescript

Features

Language support / coder friendly - I want a 3D modeling tool similar to openscad, but with a full language tools, IDE, etc for easy coding. This is why typescript is my first choice.
Implicit Functions - The other aspect that peaked my interest is ImplicitCAD. I was impressed with the elegance in the maths. Haskell is an awesome language and i would recommend anyone learn it, however IDE support was still missing at the time of this writing.
Rounded Union - I always felt this was missing in Openscad, and was a major driver for me to find my own solution. With SDF this is very easy to implement.
Version Control - using code has other major advantages like version control and diff's.
exports to OBJ file format. I was able to export STL (ascii) initially, but it turns out that OBJ was even easier and gave smaller file sizes.

3D mesh files are ugly!!! Why is it that the viewer renders a sharp image but the obj file is so imprecise? Unfortunately this is the downfall of using SDF, It is very easy for the ray marcher algorithm but very difficult to get out polygons. If anyone has the perfect solution it would be used in MRI imaging and other multi-million dollar systems.

git clone https://github.com/richardwa/tscad.git
npm install

npm run dev

npm run render ./projects/sample.ts

These were mostly implemented using Inigo's site and examples. It is a joy at how wonderful and simple these functions are.
boolean operations: union, diff, intersect
extrusions: extrude, revolve, mirror, tile
manipulations: translate, rotate, scale
3D primitives: cube, sphere, cylinder
2D primitives: square, circle, regular polygons, arbitary polygons
core CSG library is implemented in typescript and webgl (glsl)

I spent alot of time working on this to get all the features I was looking for in an extraction algorithm.
bounds can be arbitarily large without incurring much cost.
variable sized cubes when extracting surface to get a good shape and not spend too much cycles/file size on the flat parts
somewhat easy to understand implemetation. At first my implemenations had alot of conditionals (up, down , left, right etc) when working on cubes. There were symetries to be exploited for shorter code, but took a while to find the best way.
while i may still look into mesh simplification, I don't want to solely rely on post processing. Didn't want to waste cycles on creating then removing small triangles.
no cracks on the rendered object
example: rounded union of cube and sphere with variable sized mesh

while Dual Marching Cubes can produce reasonable high quality models, there are can still be rendering artifacts. To overcome these, we can use the 'slicing' render which gives a solid with holes but should be usable by a slicer. Only downside is to pre-rotate the shape on how it should sit on the bed.